Immigrants from El Salvador vs Marshallese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 12,934,032 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Marshallese within Immigrant from El Salvador communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.237. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from El Salvador within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.019% in Marshallese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from El Salvador corresponds to an increase of 19.4 Marshallese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($58,226 compared to $65,874, a difference of 13.1%), householder income under 25 years ($54,599 compared to $50,627, a difference of 7.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($86,913 compared to $83,575, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($47,973 compared to $48,137, a difference of 0.34%), median female earnings ($36,673 compared to $36,459, a difference of 0.59%), and median earnings ($42,413 compared to $41,969, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 34.7%), single male poverty (12.6% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 30.9%), and married-couple family poverty (6.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 29.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (20.0% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 1.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.0% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and male poverty (12.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 43.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 21.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.1% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.67%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 2.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.3% compared to 39.5%, a difference of 15.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.8% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.49%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 21.1%), single mother households (7.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 20.2%), and family households with children (29.8% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (44.3% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 0.82%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.9%), and average family size (3.49 compared to 3.38, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 6.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 5.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 54.9%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.90%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 54.9%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 96.1%), college, under 1 year (56.4% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 9.8%), and high school diploma (80.8% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 0.77%), bachelor's degree (31.3% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and nursery school (96.2% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 47.6%), male disability (10.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 25.4%), and disability (10.9% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 0.70%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.1% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 0.91%), and disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 50.1%, a difference of 2.1%).