Immigrants from North America vs Marshallese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 14,101,168 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Marshallese within Immigrant from North America communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.854. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from North America within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.096% in Marshallese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from North America corresponds to an increase of 95.8 Marshallese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North America and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,302 compared to $39,108, a difference of 26.1%), median male earnings ($60,265 compared to $48,137, a difference of 25.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($102,407 compared to $83,575, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($64,856 compared to $65,874, a difference of 1.6%), householder income under 25 years ($53,307 compared to $50,627, a difference of 5.3%), and median female earnings ($41,319 compared to $36,459, a difference of 13.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North America and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 44.1%), single male poverty (12.9% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 27.7%), and family poverty (7.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.6% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 1.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 3.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North America and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 34.9%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 31.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North America and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 6.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.7% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.84%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.0% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 0.94%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 39.5%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North America and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 13.7%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 13.1%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.0% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 0.41%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.84%), and family households with children (26.6% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North America and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 24.7%), no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 12.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 54.9%, a difference of 4.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North America and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 54.2%), master's degree (17.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 48.3%), and professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 42.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.33%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.34%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North America and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 0.94%, a difference of 54.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.1% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 14.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.32%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 6.2%).