Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago vs Marshallese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 10,362,294 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Marshallese within Immigrant from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.019. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.007% in Marshallese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago corresponds to an increase of 6.8 Marshallese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.3% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 21.2%), householder income over 65 years ($55,598 compared to $65,874, a difference of 18.5%), and median female earnings ($40,895 compared to $36,459, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,347 compared to $90,455, a difference of 0.99%), median family income ($93,988 compared to $95,293, a difference of 1.4%), and median household income ($80,373 compared to $78,930, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 46.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 38.3%), and single male poverty (12.9% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.8% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.40%), child poverty under the age of 5 (19.4% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (19.2% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.3% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 41.2%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (23.1% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 30.8%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.54%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.2% compared to 39.5%, a difference of 30.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 9.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.42%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.8% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 0.74%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.93%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 20.0%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 12.4%), and currently married (41.9% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.4% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 0.39%), family households (64.2% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 0.67%), and average family size (3.33 compared to 3.38, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (24.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 150.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 98.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.3% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 59.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.8% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 17.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.3% compared to 54.9%, a difference of 36.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.3% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 59.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 33.3%), master's degree (14.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 22.1%), and bachelor's degree (35.3% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (55.5% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 0.45%), 3rd grade (97.1% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.68%), and 2nd grade (97.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 53.0%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 0.94%, a difference of 20.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 0.87%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.0%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.2%).