Immigrants from Latin America vs Central American Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 502,141,016 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Central Americans within Immigrant from Latin America communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.598. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Latin America within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.142% in Central Americans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Latin America corresponds to an increase of 142.2 Central Americans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Central American communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($53,265 compared to $56,321, a difference of 5.7%), per capita income ($36,823 compared to $38,560, a difference of 4.7%), and median family income ($86,989 compared to $91,087, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,387 compared to $52,626, a difference of 2.4%), median male earnings ($46,941 compared to $48,093, a difference of 2.5%), and wage/income gap (23.7% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Central American communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 10.8%), married-couple family poverty (7.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 6.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.6% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 0.78%), child poverty among girls under 16 (20.6% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and single mother poverty (32.4% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Central American communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 5.9%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 4.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Central American communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.9% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.8% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.75%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.0% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 0.89%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.94%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Central American communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 4.0%), divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.42 compared to 3.41, a difference of 0.32%), currently married (43.8% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 0.98%), and births to unmarried women (37.1% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Central American communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 4.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 0.70%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.67%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 0.41%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 0.43%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Central American communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 11.7%), professional degree (3.3% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 8.7%), and master's degree (11.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (90.4% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.010%), 10th grade (88.3% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 0.060%), and nursery school (96.7% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.11%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Central American communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 5.5%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 4.5%), and ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 0.57%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and disability age over 75 (49.5% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 1.5%).