Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Central American Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 203,985,186 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Central Americans within Immigrant from Costa Rica communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.682. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Costa Rica within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.245% in Central Americans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Costa Rica corresponds to an increase of 1,245.1 Central Americans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Central American communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,464 compared to $38,560, a difference of 12.7%), median family income ($101,354 compared to $91,087, a difference of 11.3%), and median male earnings ($53,237 compared to $48,093, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,643 compared to $52,626, a difference of 0.030%), householder income over 65 years ($59,848 compared to $56,321, a difference of 6.3%), and wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Central American communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 24.0%), child poverty under the age of 16 (16.6% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 20.6%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (16.7% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.3% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 1.9%), single male poverty (12.5% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 4.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.7% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Central American communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 9.8%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 9.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.30%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Central American communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.9% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.62%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 0.68%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Central American communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 18.9%), single mother households (6.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 13.1%), and births to unmarried women (33.4% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.37%), family households (65.6% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 0.60%), and family households with children (28.3% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Central American communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 9.5%), no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 5.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.63%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.4% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Central American communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 48.0%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 22.4%), and professional degree (4.4% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Central American communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 11.9%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.6% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 11.3%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.010%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.29%), and female disability (11.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.3%).