Osage vs Alaskan Athabascan Female Poverty
COMPARE
Osage
Alaskan Athabascan
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Osage
Alaskan Athabascans
14.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
1.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
232nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
5.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
213th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Osage vs Alaskan Athabascan Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,795,919 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Osage and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.083 and weighted average of 14.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,807,044 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.404 and weighted average of 14.4%, a difference of 3.0%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Osage | Alaskan Athabascan |
Minimum | 1.8% | 0.78% |
Maximum | 31.5% | 69.0% |
Range | 29.7% | 68.2% |
Mean | 14.9% | 21.7% |
Median | 14.9% | 15.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.4% | 11.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.6% | 28.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.2% | 16.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.5% | 16.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.4% | 16.3% |
Demographics Similar to Osage and Alaskan Athabascans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Nigerian (14.8%, a difference of 0.31%), Alaska Native (14.7%, a difference of 0.41%), Ghanaian (14.7%, a difference of 0.61%), German Russian (14.7%, a difference of 0.67%), and Immigrants from Nigeria (14.7%, a difference of 0.82%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Bermudan (14.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Marshallese (14.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Panama (14.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Thailand (14.4%, a difference of 0.39%), and Immigrants (14.4%, a difference of 0.42%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Bermudans | 5.5 /100 | #212 | Tragic 14.4% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 5.3 /100 | #213 | Tragic 14.4% |
Marshallese | 5.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Panama | 4.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 4.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.5 /100 | #217 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 4.4 /100 | #218 | Tragic 14.4% |
Japanese | 4.1 /100 | #219 | Tragic 14.5% |
Alsatians | 4.0 /100 | #220 | Tragic 14.5% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 3.7 /100 | #221 | Tragic 14.5% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 3.7 /100 | #222 | Tragic 14.5% |
Immigrants | Africa | 3.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 14.5% |
Americans | 2.8 /100 | #224 | Tragic 14.6% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 2.8 /100 | #225 | Tragic 14.6% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 2.4 /100 | #226 | Tragic 14.6% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 2.1 /100 | #227 | Tragic 14.7% |
German Russians | 2.0 /100 | #228 | Tragic 14.7% |
Ghanaians | 1.9 /100 | #229 | Tragic 14.7% |
Alaska Natives | 1.8 /100 | #230 | Tragic 14.7% |
Nigerians | 1.7 /100 | #231 | Tragic 14.8% |
Osage | 1.5 /100 | #232 | Tragic 14.8% |