Immigrants from Guatemala vs Northern European Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 299,428,780 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Northern Europeans within Immigrant from Guatemala communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.523. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Guatemala within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.013% in Northern Europeans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Guatemala corresponds to an increase of 12.8 Northern Europeans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,550 compared to $47,698, a difference of 27.0%), median family income ($87,191 compared to $110,635, a difference of 26.9%), and median male earnings ($46,244 compared to $58,588, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,447 compared to $51,678, a difference of 0.45%), median female earnings ($35,444 compared to $40,491, a difference of 14.2%), and median earnings ($40,851 compared to $48,887, a difference of 19.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 68.8%), family poverty (12.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 53.0%), and receiving food stamps (14.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 48.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 1.3%), single father poverty (16.6% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and single male poverty (13.8% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 26.5%), female unemployment (6.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 26.2%), and unemployment (5.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 4.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 5.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 14.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.1% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.97%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 34.3%), single father households (3.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 33.3%), and births to unmarried women (37.5% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.48%), family households (65.0% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and family households with children (28.8% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 41.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 11.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 3.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 6.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 11.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 126.6%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 60.7%), and professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 51.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 2.1%), kindergarten (96.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and 1st grade (96.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 26.7%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 23.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 2.3%).