Immigrants from France vs Northern European Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 250,053,318 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Northern Europeans within Immigrant from France communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.355. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from France within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.826% in Northern Europeans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from France corresponds to an increase of 825.7 Northern Europeans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($54,557 compared to $47,698, a difference of 14.4%), median female earnings ($44,541 compared to $40,491, a difference of 10.0%), and median earnings ($53,490 compared to $48,887, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 3.3%), householder income over 65 years ($66,826 compared to $64,658, a difference of 3.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,805 compared to $51,678, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 17.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 17.2%), and married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (14.9% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 0.80%), single father poverty (16.1% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 0.99%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.0% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 13.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.9% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 8.8%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.44%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 14.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 0.27%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.33%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 10.7%), married-couple households (45.4% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 6.7%), and births to unmarried women (29.0% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.15 compared to 3.13, a difference of 0.56%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 3.2%), and family households with children (26.0% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 63.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 29.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.1% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 5.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 15.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 24.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 30.6%), doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 28.2%), and master's degree (20.3% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.8% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 0.14%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.29%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 31.2%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 17.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.8% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.99%), cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 3.4%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.8%).