Immigrants from Jordan vs Spanish American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 52,969,006 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Spanish American Indians within Immigrant from Jordan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.179. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Jordan within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.027% in Spanish American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Jordan corresponds to an increase of 26.9 Spanish American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,066 compared to $34,195, a difference of 31.8%), median male earnings ($57,145 compared to $44,010, a difference of 29.8%), and median family income ($107,715 compared to $85,728, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,370 compared to $55,573, a difference of 8.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,185 compared to $84,085, a difference of 15.6%), and wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 16.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.7% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 39.4%), married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 37.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.2% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 34.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 5.4%), and single mother poverty (27.1% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 38.4%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 25.1%), and unemployment (5.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 8.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 9.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 11.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.9% compared to 32.4%, a difference of 14.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 30.9%), births to unmarried women (29.0% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 29.2%), and single mother households (6.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.26%), married-couple households (47.7% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 2.2%), and family households with children (28.4% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 65.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 35.3%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 60.3%, a difference of 5.5%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 16.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 106.6%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 92.0%), and professional degree (4.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 78.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 95.8%, a difference of 2.2%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 95.8%, a difference of 2.3%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 95.7%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 27.0%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 21.1%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.4%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 4.6%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 6.8%).