Immigrants from Guatemala vs Spanish American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,133,046 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Spanish American Indians within Immigrant from Guatemala communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.315. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Guatemala within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.009% in Spanish American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Guatemala corresponds to a decrease of 9.3 Spanish American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,550 compared to $34,195, a difference of 9.8%), householder income under 25 years ($51,447 compared to $55,573, a difference of 8.0%), and median female earnings ($35,444 compared to $33,625, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.5% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 0.43%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,573 compared to $87,561, a difference of 1.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,950 compared to $53,077, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.6% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 16.0%), single father poverty (16.6% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 15.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.8% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 0.19%), receiving food stamps (14.6% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and married-couple family poverty (7.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 32.4%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 15.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 0.29%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 0.67%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.7% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 32.4%, a difference of 9.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 0.58%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.6% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.88%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.1% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in family households (65.0% compared to 71.2%, a difference of 9.4%), married-couple households (42.8% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 8.8%), and single mother households (7.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (37.5% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 0.18%), family households with children (28.8% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 1.0%), and currently married (42.6% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 57.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 36.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 60.3%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 1.2%), no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 10.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 60.3%, a difference of 12.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 31.1%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 29.8%), and master's degree (11.6% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (93.9% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.34%), 5th grade (94.6% compared to 94.2%, a difference of 0.40%), and 4th grade (95.1% compared to 94.6%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 10.7%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 10.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 0.080%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.2%).