Immigrants from Eastern Asia vs Spanish American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 70,808,750 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Spanish American Indians within Immigrant from Eastern Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.082. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Eastern Asia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Spanish American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Eastern Asia corresponds to an increase of 2.8 Spanish American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($53,806 compared to $34,195, a difference of 57.4%), median male earnings ($66,903 compared to $44,010, a difference of 52.0%), and median family income ($125,150 compared to $85,728, a difference of 46.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,123 compared to $55,573, a difference of 2.8%), wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 20.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,872 compared to $53,077, a difference of 31.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.3% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 60.2%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.1% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 50.0%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (13.5% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 49.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.0% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 3.7%), single male poverty (11.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 6.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 37.6%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 26.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 5.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 6.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 3.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 77.6%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (32.0% compared to 32.4%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 52.2%), births to unmarried women (25.0% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 49.4%), and single mother households (5.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 42.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.8% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 4.6%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 5.2%), and family households (64.9% compared to 71.2%, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 73.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 43.0%), and no vehicles in household (13.5% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 34.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.5% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 3.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.2% compared to 60.3%, a difference of 13.3%), and no vehicles in household (13.5% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 34.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.0% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 179.8%), professional degree (6.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 147.5%), and master's degree (20.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 117.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 95.8%, a difference of 1.9%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 95.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 95.7%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 40.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 33.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 5.7%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 49.9%, a difference of 8.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 14.2%).