Crow vs Immigrants from North America Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,470,476 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from North America within Crow communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.032. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Immigrants from North America. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Crow corresponds to a decrease of 1.3 Immigrants from North America.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from North America communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($31,729 compared to $49,302, a difference of 55.4%), wage/income gap (19.1% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 49.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($74,257 compared to $109,198, a difference of 47.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,012 compared to $53,307, a difference of 13.4%), median female earnings ($35,266 compared to $41,319, a difference of 17.2%), and median earnings ($38,707 compared to $50,108, a difference of 29.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from North America communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (9.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 113.8%), family poverty (16.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 104.6%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (31.0% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 94.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 35.4%), receiving food stamps (13.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 37.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.9% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 41.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from North America communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (15.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 249.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (16.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 232.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (17.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 229.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 0.93%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 5.4%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 25.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from North America communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (75.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 11.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (76.5% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 10.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (78.6% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (60.8% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from North America communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 62.2%), single mother households (7.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 32.9%), and births to unmarried women (40.4% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 32.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.3% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 2.0%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 3.0%), and divorced or separated (14.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 16.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from North America communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 26.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 19.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 3.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 11.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from North America communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 68.8%), master's degree (10.6% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 61.4%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 52.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (96.1% compared to 96.0%, a difference of 0.090%), no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 0.12%), and 10th grade (94.7% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from North America communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 32.6%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.9% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 26.5%), and hearing disability (4.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 3.2%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 4.8%), and cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 5.1%).