Crow vs Immigrants from France Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 48,212,471 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from France within Crow communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.650. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.025% in Immigrants from France. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Crow corresponds to a decrease of 25.5 Immigrants from France.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from France communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($31,729 compared to $54,557, a difference of 72.0%), median family income ($76,605 compared to $120,076, a difference of 56.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($74,257 compared to $113,680, a difference of 53.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,012 compared to $53,805, a difference of 14.4%), median female earnings ($35,266 compared to $44,541, a difference of 26.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($49,234 compared to $66,826, a difference of 35.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from France communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (9.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 103.4%), child poverty under the age of 5 (31.0% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 98.3%), and family poverty (16.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 97.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.9% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 26.8%), receiving food stamps (13.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 33.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 38.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from France communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (15.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 250.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (16.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 229.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (17.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 226.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 7.8%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 22.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from France communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (75.9% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 12.6%), in labor force | age 35-44 (76.5% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 11.0%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 35.1%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 3.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (60.8% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from France communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 73.4%), births to unmarried women (40.4% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 39.3%), and single mother households (7.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 33.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 5.1%), family households (65.3% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 6.5%), and married-couple households (41.4% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from France communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 38.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 27.4%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 87.1%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 7.1%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 17.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from France communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 115.3%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 93.8%), and master's degree (10.6% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 90.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.7% compared to 94.5%, a difference of 0.17%), 9th grade (96.1% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.59%), and 11th grade (92.9% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from France communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.6% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 44.8%), hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 42.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 32.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 0.29%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.0%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 4.7%).