Immigrants from Philippines vs Ethiopian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,994,910 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians within Immigrant from Philippines communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.299. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Philippines within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.016% in Ethiopians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Philippines corresponds to a decrease of 16.4 Ethiopians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 13.0%), householder income under 25 years ($57,930 compared to $53,818, a difference of 7.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($102,910 compared to $96,824, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($108,288 compared to $108,251, a difference of 0.030%), median male earnings ($55,809 compared to $56,243, a difference of 0.78%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,161 compared to $64,989, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.7% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 20.9%), child poverty among boys under 16 (14.3% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 15.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.3% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (10.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.36%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.69%), and single male poverty (10.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 16.3%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 11.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.7% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 0.57%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 8.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 69.3%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.1% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 86.2%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (49.3% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 14.3%), family households (68.3% compared to 61.2%, a difference of 11.6%), and currently married (47.6% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.3%), births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 2.0%), and average family size (3.37 compared to 3.24, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 48.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.8% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 32.8%), and no vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 13.2%), and no vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 22.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 44.2%), professional degree (3.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 37.3%), and master's degree (13.6% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 32.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.17%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.18%), and 1st grade (97.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 17.2%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 12.5%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.61%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 2.2%).