Immigrants from Costa Rica vs U.S. Virgin Islander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,372,644 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of U.S. Virgin Islanders within Immigrant from Costa Rica communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.853. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Costa Rica within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.960% in U.S. Virgin Islanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Costa Rica corresponds to an increase of 960.3 U.S. Virgin Islanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($100,141 compared to $82,736, a difference of 21.0%), median family income ($101,354 compared to $85,294, a difference of 18.8%), and median household income ($85,054 compared to $71,853, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,186 compared to $36,424, a difference of 7.6%), median earnings ($45,928 compared to $41,448, a difference of 10.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($52,643 compared to $47,448, a difference of 11.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.2% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 35.7%), family poverty (9.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 32.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (16.6% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 32.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.3% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 11.4%), single mother poverty (29.2% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 11.6%), and single male poverty (12.5% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 15.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 20.7%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 20.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 2.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 33.6%, a difference of 5.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.9% compared to 73.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.53%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 28.0%), births to unmarried women (33.4% compared to 39.6%, a difference of 18.6%), and married-couple households (46.3% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.26 compared to 3.29, a difference of 0.95%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and family households with children (28.3% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 50.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 39.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 27.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 6.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.4% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 16.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 27.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 20.5%), professional degree (4.4% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 19.7%), and master's degree (14.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (92.7% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.010%), nursery school (97.7% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.040%), and 4th grade (97.2% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.040%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 19.7%), ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 15.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.6% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 2.1%), disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 4.5%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 4.9%).