Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Immigrants from Serbia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 90,571,905 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Serbia within Immigrant from Costa Rica communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.540. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Costa Rica within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.017% in Immigrants from Serbia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Costa Rica corresponds to an increase of 16.9 Immigrants from Serbia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Immigrants from Serbia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,464 compared to $50,810, a difference of 16.9%), median male earnings ($53,237 compared to $60,600, a difference of 13.8%), and median earnings ($45,928 compared to $51,557, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,643 compared to $53,321, a difference of 1.3%), wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 5.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($59,848 compared to $63,387, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Immigrants from Serbia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.2% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 23.5%), married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 22.3%), and family poverty (9.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.7% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 3.1%), single father poverty (16.3% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 4.6%), and single mother poverty (29.2% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Immigrants from Serbia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 17.1%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 11.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.90%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Immigrants from Serbia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 86.2%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 0.47%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 0.85%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Immigrants from Serbia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 25.7%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 19.1%), and births to unmarried women (33.4% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.3% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 1.4%), currently married (46.0% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 2.0%), and average family size (3.26 compared to 3.13, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Immigrants from Serbia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 29.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 19.7%), and no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 88.2%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.4% compared to 51.3%, a difference of 8.1%), and no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 15.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Immigrants from Serbia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 32.6%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 31.2%), and master's degree (14.7% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.44%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.45%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Immigrants from Serbia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 11.4%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 11.4%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.3%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 2.4%).