Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Immigrants from Moldova Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 84,498,212 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Moldova within Immigrant from Costa Rica communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.439. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Costa Rica within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.109% in Immigrants from Moldova. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Costa Rica corresponds to an increase of 108.6 Immigrants from Moldova.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($53,237 compared to $59,417, a difference of 11.6%), median earnings ($45,928 compared to $50,274, a difference of 9.5%), and per capita income ($43,464 compared to $47,489, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($59,848 compared to $62,939, a difference of 5.2%), wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 6.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($52,643 compared to $56,168, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (17.0% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 22.1%), family poverty (9.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 21.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (16.6% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.7% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 4.5%), single father poverty (16.3% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 6.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 11.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 21.9%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 12.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 3.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 5.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.9% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.88%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.4% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 22.3%), single mother households (6.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 19.2%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.1%), family households (65.6% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and family households with children (28.3% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 9.0%), no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 4.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.50%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.4% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 14.7%), master's degree (14.7% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 13.4%), and bachelor's degree (36.9% compared to 41.6%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.31%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.32%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.32%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 15.3%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 7.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (22.6% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 0.48%), ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.82%), and male disability (11.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.83%).