Immigrants from Fiji vs Immigrants from Caribbean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 89,633,199 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Caribbean within Immigrant from Fiji communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.412. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Fiji within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.243% in Immigrants from Caribbean. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Fiji corresponds to a decrease of 243.3 Immigrants from Caribbean.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($64,795 compared to $48,535, a difference of 33.5%), median household income ($93,933 compared to $71,860, a difference of 30.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,952 compared to $82,513, a difference of 29.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 9.9%), householder income under 25 years ($57,074 compared to $50,757, a difference of 12.4%), and median female earnings ($41,656 compared to $36,414, a difference of 14.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.1% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 61.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 49.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 49.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.7% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 8.4%), single mother poverty (26.6% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 17.0%), and single female poverty (19.1% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 17.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.3% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 38.3%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 22.1%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.8% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.4% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.9% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 8.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.3% compared to 71.9%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.6% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.6% compared to 78.8%, a difference of 0.27%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.5% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 0.68%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.2% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 36.5%), single mother households (6.7% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 25.8%), and married-couple households (48.2% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.45 compared to 3.33, a difference of 3.8%), family households (68.8% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 5.3%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 150.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 116.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.1% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 78.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 14.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.3% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 40.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.1% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 78.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 21.8%), no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 20.7%), and college, under 1 year (63.4% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (92.3% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.10%), 8th grade (93.2% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 0.34%), and 6th grade (95.2% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.92% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 26.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 14.8%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.69%), cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 1.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.0% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 1.6%).