Immigrants from Zaire vs Immigrants from Caribbean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 104,271,660 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Caribbean within Immigrant from Zaire communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.740. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Zaire within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.632% in Immigrants from Caribbean. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Zaire corresponds to an increase of 631.6 Immigrants from Caribbean.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zaire and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($54,512 compared to $48,535, a difference of 12.3%), householder income under 25 years ($45,529 compared to $50,757, a difference of 11.5%), and wage/income gap (22.3% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($71,801 compared to $71,860, a difference of 0.080%), median earnings ($41,325 compared to $41,119, a difference of 0.50%), and median female earnings ($36,017 compared to $36,414, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zaire and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 52.0%), receiving food stamps (13.4% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 46.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 45.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.3% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 0.41%), child poverty under the age of 5 (21.3% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 0.65%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.8% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 0.78%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zaire and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.6% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 33.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 28.1%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.0% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 11.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 13.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 13.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zaire and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.7% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 30.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 71.9%, a difference of 6.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.2% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.42%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.61%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zaire and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (34.5% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 15.5%), single mother households (7.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 13.1%), and family households (59.2% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.7% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 1.2%), currently married (42.0% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and married-couple households (40.1% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zaire and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 75.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 16.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.7% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.8% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 10.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 14.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.7% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 14.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zaire and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 55.7%), no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 28.0%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.66%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.66%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zaire and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 21.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 19.8%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (11.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.85%), disability age 65 to 74 (24.3% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 0.96%), and disability (11.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 1.1%).