Immigrants from Iran vs Immigrants from Caribbean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 262,458,505 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Caribbean within Immigrant from Iran communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.157. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Iran within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.014% in Immigrants from Caribbean. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Iran corresponds to a decrease of 13.7 Immigrants from Caribbean.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iran and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($130,894 compared to $83,319, a difference of 57.1%), per capita income ($57,759 compared to $37,254, a difference of 55.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($75,081 compared to $48,535, a difference of 54.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,880 compared to $50,757, a difference of 10.1%), median female earnings ($47,154 compared to $36,414, a difference of 29.5%), and median earnings ($57,612 compared to $41,119, a difference of 40.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iran and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (8.3% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 134.9%), child poverty under the age of 16 (12.4% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 67.7%), and family poverty (7.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 67.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.3% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 1.1%), single male poverty (11.4% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 16.5%), and single father poverty (14.2% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 22.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iran and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 27.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 21.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iran and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.0% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 2.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (71.8% compared to 71.9%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.17%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iran and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (4.8% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 74.2%), births to unmarried women (24.0% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 66.2%), and single father households (1.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 34.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 1.2%), family households (64.1% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.33, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iran and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 134.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 46.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 37.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.7% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 14.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.9% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 31.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 37.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iran and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.0% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 136.3%), professional degree (7.3% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 106.7%), and master's degree (21.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 79.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.96%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.96%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.96%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iran and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 37.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 34.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (8.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 33.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 2.8%), cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 6.0%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 6.2%).