Immigrants from Malaysia vs Immigrants from Egypt Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,566,388 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Egypt within Immigrant from Malaysia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.028. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Malaysia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.007% in Immigrants from Egypt. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Malaysia corresponds to an increase of 7.2 Immigrants from Egypt.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Egypt communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,983 compared to $47,361, a difference of 5.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($107,650 compared to $103,192, a difference of 4.3%), and median family income ($115,880 compared to $111,689, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,179 compared to $54,239, a difference of 0.11%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 0.64%), and householder income over 65 years ($65,497 compared to $64,299, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Egypt communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.5% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 11.5%), single father poverty (15.2% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 5.9%), and male poverty (11.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (15.0% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 0.090%), single mother poverty (27.3% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.53%), and receiving food stamps (10.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.82%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Egypt communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 12.6%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 6.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 0.040%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 0.29%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Egypt communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.3% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 0.81%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 0.69%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.28%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.070%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 0.10%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Egypt communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 6.2%), births to unmarried women (27.4% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 3.8%), and family households (64.0% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.22 compared to 3.24, a difference of 0.59%), currently married (47.3% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 0.92%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Egypt communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 11.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.3% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 2.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.5% compared to 87.8%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.7% compared to 53.8%, a difference of 2.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Egypt communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 21.5%), professional degree (5.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 12.5%), and master's degree (18.9% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.20%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.20%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Egypt communities in the United States are seen in cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 2.2%), ambulatory disability (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.2%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 0.12%), disability age over 75 (46.4% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.31%), and female disability (11.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.35%).