Immigrants from Fiji vs Immigrants from Armenia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 52,698,785 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Armenia within Immigrant from Fiji communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.380. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Fiji within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.044% in Immigrants from Armenia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Fiji corresponds to a decrease of 44.4 Immigrants from Armenia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Armenia communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($64,795 compared to $53,974, a difference of 20.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,952 compared to $94,863, a difference of 12.7%), and median household income ($93,933 compared to $83,555, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,656 compared to $40,340, a difference of 3.3%), per capita income ($42,694 compared to $44,552, a difference of 4.3%), and median earnings ($48,305 compared to $46,094, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Armenia communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 43.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 37.9%), and married-couple family poverty (5.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (19.1% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 2.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.9% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 2.5%), and single mother poverty (26.6% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Armenia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 53.8%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.8% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 27.2%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 4.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 12.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 13.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Armenia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.9% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 16.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.3% compared to 71.7%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.4% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.5% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.52%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Armenia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 29.1%), single father households (2.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 28.6%), and family households with children (30.5% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.45 compared to 3.35, a difference of 3.2%), currently married (46.2% compared to 44.3%, a difference of 4.1%), and family households (68.8% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Armenia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 48.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (26.1% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 39.9%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 35.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 89.4%, a difference of 3.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.3% compared to 53.3%, a difference of 16.9%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 35.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Armenia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 21.2%), bachelor's degree (33.7% compared to 39.4%, a difference of 16.7%), and master's degree (12.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (96.2% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.050%), 4th grade (95.8% compared to 95.8%, a difference of 0.050%), and 2nd grade (96.4% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.12%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Armenia communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 50.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 27.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.3%), male disability (11.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 2.4%), and cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 3.2%).