Immigrants from Fiji vs Immigrants from Cameroon Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 53,595,289 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cameroon within Immigrant from Fiji communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.299. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Fiji within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.018% in Immigrants from Cameroon. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Fiji corresponds to a decrease of 17.8 Immigrants from Cameroon.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Cameroon communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($103,954 compared to $88,214, a difference of 17.8%), householder income under 25 years ($57,074 compared to $51,433, a difference of 11.0%), and median household income ($93,933 compared to $85,314, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 1.1%), householder income over 65 years ($64,795 compared to $63,907, a difference of 1.4%), and median female earnings ($41,656 compared to $40,354, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Cameroon communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (13.2% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 15.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.2% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 14.6%), and married-couple family poverty (5.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.15%), receiving food stamps (12.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.77%), and family poverty (8.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Cameroon communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 28.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 21.2%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.1%), female unemployment (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Cameroon communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.9% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 14.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 68.7%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.6% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.6% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.3% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Cameroon communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.2% compared to 34.7%, a difference of 19.1%), single mother households (6.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 18.3%), and married-couple households (48.2% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.2% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 4.4%), family households with children (30.5% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 4.5%), and average family size (3.45 compared to 3.30, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Cameroon communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 50.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (26.1% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 32.5%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.3% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 13.2%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 22.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Cameroon communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 37.7%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 26.8%), and master's degree (12.4% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.99%), kindergarten (96.5% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.99%), and 1st grade (96.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Cameroon communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.92% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 47.5%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 20.4%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 3.0%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 3.5%).