Cherokee vs Immigrants from Liberia Community Comparison

COMPARE

Cherokee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Liberia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Cherokee

Immigrants from Liberia

Fair
Poor
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,533
SOCIAL INDEX
12.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
303rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Liberia Integration in Cherokee Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 129,763,849 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Liberia within Cherokee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.010. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cherokee within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Immigrants from Liberia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cherokee corresponds to a decrease of 0.2 Immigrants from Liberia.
Cherokee Integration in Immigrants from Liberia Communities

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Liberia Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 33.4%), median female earnings ($34,742 compared to $37,970, a difference of 9.3%), and median earnings ($41,252 compared to $42,923, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,843 compared to $80,863, a difference of 0.020%), householder income under 25 years ($47,848 compared to $47,981, a difference of 0.28%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,133 compared to $53,967, a difference of 0.31%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Liberia Income
Income MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Liberia
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,203
Tragic
$38,165
Median Family Income
Tragic
$88,209
Tragic
$90,450
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,682
Tragic
$74,896
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,252
Tragic
$42,923
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,669
Tragic
$48,317
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,742
Tragic
$37,970
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,848
Tragic
$47,981
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,843
Tragic
$80,863
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$86,125
Tragic
$87,739
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,133
Tragic
$53,967
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Exceptional
20.6%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Liberia Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.1% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 26.4%), single father poverty (19.6% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 23.7%), and single mother poverty (34.5% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (14.4% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 0.16%), female poverty (15.6% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 0.42%), and male poverty (13.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 0.76%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Liberia Poverty
Poverty MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Liberia
Poverty
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
14.4%
Families
Tragic
10.6%
Tragic
10.8%
Males
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
13.0%
Females
Tragic
15.6%
Tragic
15.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.7%
Tragic
20.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.2%
Tragic
15.4%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.7%
Tragic
20.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Tragic
19.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.7%
Tragic
19.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Tragic
20.2%
Single Males
Tragic
16.1%
Good
12.7%
Single Females
Tragic
25.7%
Tragic
22.5%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.6%
Exceptional
15.9%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.5%
Tragic
30.1%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Poor
5.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Average
11.0%
Tragic
12.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.0%
Tragic
12.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.2%
Tragic
15.1%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Liberia Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 11.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 10.6%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.21%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.71%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.9% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 1.0%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Liberia Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Liberia
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Tragic
5.8%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
6.1%
Females
Fair
5.3%
Tragic
5.6%
Youth < 25
Fair
11.8%
Tragic
12.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
17.9%
Tragic
18.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.5%
Tragic
11.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.6%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.2%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Poor
4.6%
Tragic
4.8%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
5.4%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
5.5%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.8%
Tragic
10.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.3%
Tragic
8.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Tragic
10.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
6.1%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Liberia Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (61.9% compared to 67.6%, a difference of 9.1%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.6% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.1% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 4.6%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Liberia Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Liberia
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
61.9%
Exceptional
67.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.2%
Exceptional
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.2%
Exceptional
41.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.9%
Exceptional
77.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.1%
Exceptional
85.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.6%
Exceptional
85.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
81.4%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.0%
Average
82.7%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Liberia Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 27.8%), married-couple households (46.7% compared to 40.3%, a difference of 15.9%), and currently married (46.9% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 2.6%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 2.7%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.27, a difference of 2.8%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Liberia Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Liberia
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Tragic
62.0%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.5%
Exceptional
28.2%
Married-couple Households
Good
46.7%
Tragic
40.3%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Exceptional
3.27
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.5%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
6.8%
Tragic
8.7%
Currently Married
Good
46.9%
Tragic
41.8%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.7%
Tragic
12.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.7%
Tragic
37.6%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Liberia Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 57.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 44.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 34.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 87.8%, a difference of 5.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 51.3%, a difference of 16.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 34.5%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Liberia Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Liberia
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
12.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.4%
Tragic
87.8%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.9%
Tragic
51.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.0%
Tragic
17.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
5.4%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Liberia Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 42.1%), bachelor's degree (30.2% compared to 33.5%, a difference of 11.1%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.5% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.090%), high school diploma (88.5% compared to 88.2%, a difference of 0.40%), and 11th grade (92.4% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.55%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Liberia Education Level
Education Level MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Liberia
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Tragic
2.5%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.5%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.5%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.4%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.3%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
97.1%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
96.9%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
96.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Tragic
95.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Tragic
95.4%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Poor
94.5%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Poor
93.3%
11th Grade
Average
92.4%
Tragic
91.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.5%
Tragic
90.4%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.5%
Tragic
88.2%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.9%
Tragic
84.4%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.1%
Tragic
61.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.2%
Tragic
55.7%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.9%
Tragic
42.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.2%
Tragic
33.5%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Tragic
12.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Tragic
3.4%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.5%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Liberia Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 48.0%), disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 28.2%), and male disability (14.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 3.7%), disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 4.5%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 9.5%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Liberia Disability
Disability MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Liberia
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
12.4%
Males
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
11.9%
Females
Tragic
14.9%
Tragic
12.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.8%
Tragic
1.4%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
6.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.7%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.5%
Tragic
13.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
28.2%
Tragic
25.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.2%
Tragic
48.1%
Vision
Tragic
2.9%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Excellent
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.0%
Tragic
18.7%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.9%
Tragic
6.4%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Tragic
2.6%