Lithuanian vs Immigrants from Indonesia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,676,421 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Indonesia within Lithuanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.752. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lithuanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.125% in Immigrants from Indonesia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Lithuanians corresponds to an increase of 125.0 Immigrants from Indonesia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.7% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 10.2%), householder income under 25 years ($53,552 compared to $55,521, a difference of 3.7%), and median household income ($93,852 compared to $97,297, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($115,395 compared to $115,162, a difference of 0.20%), median male earnings ($61,228 compared to $60,935, a difference of 0.48%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($112,484 compared to $113,519, a difference of 0.92%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 20.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 19.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.7% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 0.86%), child poverty among boys under 16 (14.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and single female poverty (19.2% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 22.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 22.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.70%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.91%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 33.5%, a difference of 20.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 73.4%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.8% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 0.77%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.77%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.83%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 7.5%), family households with children (26.6% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 7.2%), and births to unmarried women (29.6% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.9% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 0.68%), currently married (49.0% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 3.0%), and family households (64.0% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 20.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 14.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (58.2% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 1.2%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.7% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 66.0%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 4.8%), and high school diploma (92.0% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (68.8% compared to 68.9%, a difference of 0.18%), professional degree (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.61%), and associate's degree (50.6% compared to 51.0%, a difference of 0.75%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 39.7%), hearing disability (3.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 20.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.4%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.4% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 3.4%).