Immigrants from Guatemala vs Immigrants from Kuwait Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,105,161 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Kuwait within Immigrant from Guatemala communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.137. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Guatemala within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Immigrants from Kuwait. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Guatemala corresponds to an increase of 2.8 Immigrants from Kuwait.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Kuwait communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($87,191 compared to $109,731, a difference of 25.9%), median male earnings ($46,244 compared to $57,562, a difference of 24.5%), and per capita income ($37,550 compared to $46,543, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,447 compared to $48,126, a difference of 6.9%), median female earnings ($35,444 compared to $41,055, a difference of 15.8%), and wage/income gap (22.5% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 18.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Kuwait communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 45.8%), married-couple family poverty (7.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 42.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.6% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 39.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.6% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 3.6%), single male poverty (13.8% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 6.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 10.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Kuwait communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.6% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 24.8%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 22.5%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 6.7%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Kuwait communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 4.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.1% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Kuwait communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 44.7%), single mother households (7.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 33.6%), and births to unmarried women (37.5% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 30.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 62.4%, a difference of 4.3%), family households with children (28.8% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 4.7%), and average family size (3.41 compared to 3.19, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Kuwait communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 19.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 10.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 2.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 3.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Kuwait communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 88.4%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 84.0%), and professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 66.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.8%), kindergarten (96.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and 1st grade (96.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Kuwait communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 20.8%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 17.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.7% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 0.070%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 0.75%), and cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 1.9%).