Immigrants from Guatemala vs Immigrants from Eritrea Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 98,298,750 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eritrea within Immigrant from Guatemala communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.582. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Guatemala within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.074% in Immigrants from Eritrea. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Guatemala corresponds to an increase of 73.8 Immigrants from Eritrea.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,550 compared to $44,509, a difference of 18.5%), median family income ($87,191 compared to $102,823, a difference of 17.9%), and median female earnings ($35,444 compared to $41,485, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,447 compared to $51,574, a difference of 0.25%), wage/income gap (22.5% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 4.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,950 compared to $60,096, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 24.8%), married-couple family poverty (7.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 21.7%), and family poverty (12.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 0.040%), single female poverty (24.1% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 10.6%), and single mother poverty (33.3% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 10.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 27.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 23.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.7% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 8.5%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 9.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 9.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 68.9%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.1% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.6% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.7% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 19.4%), births to unmarried women (37.5% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 18.4%), and single mother households (7.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.38%), married-couple households (42.8% compared to 42.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and currently married (42.6% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 16.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 10.6%), and no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 89.4%, a difference of 0.65%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 52.3%), master's degree (11.6% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 40.9%), and professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 40.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.4% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.81%), kindergarten (96.4% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.82%), and 1st grade (96.4% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.83%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 16.9%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 16.1%), and ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 2.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and disability age over 75 (49.1% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 3.0%).