Immigrants from Guatemala vs Immigrants from Serbia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,940,203 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Serbia within Immigrant from Guatemala communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.474. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Guatemala within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.007% in Immigrants from Serbia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Guatemala corresponds to an increase of 7.5 Immigrants from Serbia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Serbia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,550 compared to $50,810, a difference of 35.3%), median male earnings ($46,244 compared to $60,600, a difference of 31.0%), and median family income ($87,191 compared to $113,463, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,447 compared to $53,321, a difference of 3.6%), wage/income gap (22.5% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 15.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,950 compared to $63,387, a difference of 17.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Serbia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 61.8%), family poverty (12.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 54.8%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 53.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.6% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 6.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 8.4%), and single male poverty (13.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 20.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Serbia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 26.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.6% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 25.8%), and female unemployment (6.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.7% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 3.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 5.8%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Serbia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (81.1% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 3.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.7% compared to 86.2%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 0.32%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 0.68%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Serbia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 48.4%), single mother households (7.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 44.4%), and births to unmarried women (37.5% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 32.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 5.0%), family households (65.0% compared to 61.6%, a difference of 5.6%), and married-couple households (42.8% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Serbia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 35.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 20.1%), and no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 88.2%, a difference of 0.81%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 51.3%, a difference of 4.2%), and no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Serbia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 91.1%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 68.8%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 68.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.8%), kindergarten (96.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and 1st grade (96.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Serbia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (25.7% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 19.8%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 18.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 3.3%), female disability (12.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.8%), and disability (11.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 4.9%).