Immigrants from Guatemala vs Immigrants from Indonesia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 189,419,641 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Indonesia within Immigrant from Guatemala communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.500. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Guatemala within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Immigrants from Indonesia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Guatemala corresponds to a decrease of 5.1 Immigrants from Indonesia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($81,341 compared to $107,627, a difference of 32.3%), median family income ($87,191 compared to $115,162, a difference of 32.1%), and median male earnings ($46,244 compared to $60,935, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,447 compared to $55,521, a difference of 7.9%), wage/income gap (22.5% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 16.1%), and median female earnings ($35,444 compared to $43,412, a difference of 22.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 53.8%), child poverty under the age of 16 (21.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 53.4%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (21.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 52.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 10.7%), single father poverty (16.6% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 13.1%), and single male poverty (13.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 18.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 29.3%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 23.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 4.1%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 5.8%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 33.5%, a difference of 5.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 73.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.1% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.6% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.88%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 37.0%), single mother households (7.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 35.6%), and births to unmarried women (37.5% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 35.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.8% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 1.1%), family households (65.0% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and average family size (3.41 compared to 3.27, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 10.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 7.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 1.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 5.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 70.4%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 55.3%), and master's degree (11.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 51.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.4% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (96.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (96.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 20.3%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 20.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.7% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 0.17%), disability age over 75 (49.1% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 2.7%), and cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 3.8%).