Immigrants from Brazil vs Dutch West Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,995,026 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Dutch West Indians within Immigrant from Brazil communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.171. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Brazil within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Dutch West Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Brazil corresponds to a decrease of 5.2 Dutch West Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,470 compared to $79,171, a difference of 34.5%), per capita income ($48,164 compared to $35,922, a difference of 34.1%), and median family income ($109,418 compared to $81,852, a difference of 33.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 2.6%), householder income under 25 years ($54,487 compared to $45,816, a difference of 18.9%), and median female earnings ($41,273 compared to $34,106, a difference of 21.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.0% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 45.8%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 44.2%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.1% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 43.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 4.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 10.0%), and single father poverty (15.3% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 25.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 28.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 26.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.3%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 61.7%, a difference of 8.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 7.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.1% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.5% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.6% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 29.5%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 21.3%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 0.72%), family households (63.6% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 36.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 22.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 89.0%, a difference of 0.57%), no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 3.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 71.4%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 65.4%), and master's degree (17.4% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 63.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (97.3% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.020%), 6th grade (96.9% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.020%), and 3rd grade (97.7% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.030%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 53.5%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 48.1%), and ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 45.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 6.6%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 11.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 15.0%).