Immigrants from Cambodia vs Dutch West Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,806,972 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Dutch West Indians within Immigrant from Cambodia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.112. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Cambodia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.017% in Dutch West Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Cambodia corresponds to an increase of 17.1 Dutch West Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($96,537 compared to $79,171, a difference of 21.9%), median household income ($83,304 compared to $68,412, a difference of 21.8%), and median family income ($97,222 compared to $81,852, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($51,594 compared to $46,656, a difference of 10.6%), median earnings ($45,090 compared to $40,107, a difference of 12.4%), and per capita income ($40,434 compared to $35,922, a difference of 12.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.9% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 33.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 30.5%), and single female poverty (21.2% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 29.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.61%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.6% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 0.69%), and receiving food stamps (13.9% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 29.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 27.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.5%), female unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 3.3%), and male unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 61.7%, a difference of 7.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.9% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 2.3%), in labor force | age 16-19 (36.7% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 18.1%), births to unmarried women (34.8% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 10.4%), and family households with children (28.9% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (44.9% compared to 44.9%, a difference of 0.040%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 0.43%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 9.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 3.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.1% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 0.82%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 89.0%, a difference of 0.89%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 69.4%), master's degree (12.9% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 21.4%), and bachelor's degree (34.2% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (88.1% compared to 88.5%, a difference of 0.54%), ged/equivalency (82.2% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 0.78%), and high school diploma (85.6% compared to 86.5%, a difference of 0.97%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 64.4%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 44.2%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 35.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 0.15%), disability age over 75 (50.0% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 3.1%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 12.2%).