Immigrants from El Salvador vs Dutch West Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,401,563 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Dutch West Indians within Immigrant from El Salvador communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.104. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from El Salvador within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Dutch West Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from El Salvador corresponds to an increase of 1.5 Dutch West Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($54,599 compared to $45,816, a difference of 19.2%), median household income ($81,213 compared to $68,412, a difference of 18.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,176 compared to $79,171, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($47,973 compared to $46,656, a difference of 2.8%), median earnings ($42,413 compared to $40,107, a difference of 5.8%), and per capita income ($38,394 compared to $35,922, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 28.4%), single father poverty (15.0% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 28.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.3% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (6.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 5.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.1% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 5.5%), and family poverty (11.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 17.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.1% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 16.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.8% compared to 61.7%, a difference of 8.3%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.9% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (34.3% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 20.1%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 11.6%), and family households with children (29.8% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (44.3% compared to 44.9%, a difference of 1.3%), family households (67.0% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 4.1%), and single mother households (7.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 8.4%), no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 7.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 0.020%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 89.0%, a difference of 0.63%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 88.0%), master's degree (12.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 12.9%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (51.0% compared to 50.5%, a difference of 0.98%), college, under 1 year (56.4% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and nursery school (96.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 77.8%), hearing disability (2.6% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 65.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 46.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 3.1%), disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 5.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.1% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 17.9%).