Immigrants from North America vs European Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 458,217,458 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Europeans within Immigrant from North America communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.408. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from North America within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.073% in Europeans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from North America corresponds to an increase of 73.3 Europeans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North America and European communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,302 compared to $45,836, a difference of 7.6%), median female earnings ($41,319 compared to $39,457, a difference of 4.7%), and median earnings ($50,108 compared to $47,915, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($64,856 compared to $63,779, a difference of 1.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($109,198 compared to $106,367, a difference of 2.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,307 compared to $51,796, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North America and European communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 7.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.3% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 7.3%), and married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.6% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.17%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.9% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 0.21%), and female poverty (12.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North America and European communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 7.1%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 6.2%), and unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North America and European communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 41.1%, a difference of 5.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.7% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 0.16%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North America and European communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (26.6% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 5.1%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 5.1%), and married-couple households (48.4% compared to 49.6%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.12 compared to 3.14, a difference of 0.74%), births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North America and European communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 22.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 16.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 93.0%, a difference of 1.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 6.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 13.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North America and European communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 11.1%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 10.5%), and master's degree (17.2% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.8% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 0.10%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.18%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North America and European communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 6.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 6.1%), and disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.51%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and female disability (12.3% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 1.2%).