Immigrants from Cuba vs Immigrants from Morocco Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 149,917,242 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Morocco within Immigrant from Cuba communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.148. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Cuba within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Immigrants from Morocco. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Cuba corresponds to a decrease of 1.6 Immigrants from Morocco.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($44,735 compared to $60,647, a difference of 35.6%), median family income ($78,249 compared to $105,964, a difference of 35.4%), and per capita income ($34,910 compared to $46,430, a difference of 33.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 7.9%), householder income under 25 years ($50,374 compared to $54,593, a difference of 8.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($80,662 compared to $102,015, a difference of 26.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (20.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 75.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (17.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 55.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.9% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 52.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.4% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 0.41%), single male poverty (12.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.70%), and single female poverty (21.2% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 24.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 21.6%), and male unemployment (4.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 5.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.2% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 20.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.0% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.35%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (41.5% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 36.6%), divorced or separated (15.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 28.1%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (44.2% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 0.0%), family households with children (26.8% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 0.67%), and average family size (3.26 compared to 3.21, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 44.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 14.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.3% compared to 87.4%, a difference of 4.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 50.3%, a difference of 9.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 11.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 73.7%), master's degree (10.9% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 57.3%), and professional degree (3.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 37.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.59%), kindergarten (97.1% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.62%), and 1st grade (97.1% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 18.3%), vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 17.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 0.49%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 0.68%), and disability age over 75 (47.7% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 1.3%).