Immigrants from Cuba vs Immigrants from Singapore Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,356,933 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Singapore within Immigrant from Cuba communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.149. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Cuba within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.000% in Immigrants from Singapore. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Cuba corresponds to an increase of 0.5 Immigrants from Singapore.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($78,249 compared to $134,818, a difference of 72.3%), per capita income ($34,910 compared to $58,353, a difference of 67.2%), and median male earnings ($43,461 compared to $71,348, a difference of 64.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,374 compared to $56,835, a difference of 12.8%), wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 29.4%), and median female earnings ($33,291 compared to $47,986, a difference of 44.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (20.8% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 150.8%), married-couple family poverty (7.5% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 82.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (17.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 77.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 6.5%), single father poverty (16.4% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 14.7%), and single female poverty (21.2% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 15.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 20.1%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 16.6%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.52%), female unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.1% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.2% compared to 33.5%, a difference of 10.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.2% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.24%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (41.5% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 61.8%), single mother households (7.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 51.8%), and divorced or separated (15.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 47.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.26 compared to 3.16, a difference of 3.4%), family households with children (26.8% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 3.7%), and family households (68.2% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 48.7%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.3% compared to 87.2%, a difference of 4.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 2.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 212.9%), master's degree (10.9% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 115.7%), and professional degree (3.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 115.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (97.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (97.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 37.8%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 33.5%), and ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 3.6%), disability age over 75 (47.7% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 4.5%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 6.6%).