Osage vs Celtic Female Poverty
COMPARE
Osage
Celtic
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Osage
Celtics
14.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
1.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
232nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
49.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
175th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Osage vs Celtic Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,795,919 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Osage and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.083 and weighted average of 14.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,846,795 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.728 and weighted average of 13.4%, a difference of 10.1%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Osage | Celtic |
| Minimum | 1.8% | 2.2% |
| Maximum | 31.5% | 100.0% |
| Range | 29.7% | 97.8% |
| Mean | 14.9% | 15.9% |
| Median | 14.9% | 12.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.4% | 10.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.6% | 18.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.2% | 8.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.5% | 12.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.4% | 12.5% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Osage by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (14.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Nigerian (14.8%, a difference of 0.31%), Alaska Native (14.7%, a difference of 0.41%), Ghanaian (14.7%, a difference of 0.61%), and Fijian (14.9%, a difference of 0.62%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 2.8 /100 | #225 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 2.4 /100 | #226 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 2.1 /100 | #227 | Tragic 14.7% |
| German Russians | 2.0 /100 | #228 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Ghanaians | 1.9 /100 | #229 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Alaska Natives | 1.8 /100 | #230 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Nigerians | 1.7 /100 | #231 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Osage | 1.5 /100 | #232 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 1.4 /100 | #233 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Fijians | 1.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 0.9 /100 | #235 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Cree | 0.7 /100 | #236 | Tragic 15.1% |
| French American Indians | 0.6 /100 | #237 | Tragic 15.1% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 0.6 /100 | #238 | Tragic 15.1% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.5 /100 | #239 | Tragic 15.2% |
Demographics Similar to Celtics by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Immigrants from Spain (13.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Iraq (13.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Morocco (13.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (13.4%, a difference of 0.080%), and Israeli (13.5%, a difference of 0.080%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |
| Lebanese | 55.9 /100 | #169 | Average 13.4% |
| Colombians | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 13.4% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 54.6 /100 | #171 | Average 13.4% |
| Mongolians | 53.6 /100 | #172 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 50.8 /100 | #173 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 13.4% |
| Celtics | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 49.9 /100 | #176 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 49.4 /100 | #177 | Average 13.4% |
| Israelis | 49.1 /100 | #178 | Average 13.5% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 48.8 /100 | #179 | Average 13.5% |
| South Americans | 44.8 /100 | #180 | Average 13.5% |
| Venezuelans | 44.5 /100 | #181 | Average 13.5% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 44.5 /100 | #182 | Average 13.5% |