Ecuadorian GED/Equivalency
COMPARE
Ecuadorian
Select to Compare
GED/Equivalency
Ecuadorian GED/Equivalency
81.7%
GED/EQUIVALENCY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
299th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ecuadorian GED/Equivalency Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,864,750 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians and percentage of population with at least ged/equivalency education in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.161 and weighted average of 81.7%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.093% in percentage of population with at least ged/equivalency education.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Ecuadorians and percentage of population with at least ged/equivalency education does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Ecuadorians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of population with at least ged/equivalency education within an area, or if Ecuadorians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of population with at least ged/equivalency education due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Ecuadorians by GED/Equivalency
In terms of ged/equivalency, the demographic groups most similar to Ecuadorians are Fijian (81.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Dutch West Indian (81.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Ute (81.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Haiti (81.6%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Portugal (81.6%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | GED/Equivalency |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 82.0% |
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 82.0% |
| Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 82.0% |
| Nepalese | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 81.9% |
| Vietnamese | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 81.9% |
| Immigrants from Bangladesh | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 81.9% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 81.8% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 81.7% |
| Fijians | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 81.6% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 81.6% |
| Immigrants from Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 81.6% |
| Immigrants from Portugal | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 81.6% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 81.5% |
| Immigrants from Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 81.3% |
| Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 81.3% |
Ecuadorian GED/Equivalency Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ecuadorian Data | GED/Equivalency Data |
| Minimum | 0.10% | 61.7% |
| Maximum | 59.4% | 91.9% |
| Range | 59.3% | 30.2% |
| Mean | 11.4% | 79.8% |
| Median | 9.1% | 80.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.5% | 76.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.2% | 83.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.8% | 7.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.0% | 5.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.9% | 5.8% |
Correlation Details
| Ecuadorian Percentile | Sample Size | GED/Equivalency |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.10% | 225,971,849 | 85.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.42% | 35,456,479 | 85.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.74% | 18,239,071 | 84.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.03% | 7,929,214 | 84.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.33% | 4,841,795 | 84.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.64% | 3,861,198 | 82.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.93% | 1,926,433 | 83.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.29% | 10,140,357 | 79.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.49% | 1,889,443 | 82.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.82% | 1,070,606 | 78.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.16% | 1,010,740 | 78.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.39% | 701,516 | 82.5% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.68% | 275,994 | 82.2% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.04% | 212,133 | 81.6% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.28% | 370,549 | 82.7% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.62% | 297,502 | 76.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.94% | 76,880 | 83.7% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.12% | 295,399 | 81.1% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.45% | 98,704 | 78.1% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.79% | 75,504 | 83.2% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.10% | 159,101 | 80.7% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.41% | 105,683 | 83.2% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.71% | 199,062 | 77.0% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.97% | 101,959 | 82.8% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.25% | 222,817 | 72.7% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.52% | 183,356 | 75.7% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.83% | 150,353 | 78.6% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.12% | 107,043 | 76.7% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.53% | 156,526 | 79.8% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.72% | 334,815 | 74.5% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.07% | 31,554 | 73.8% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.34% | 12,343 | 85.1% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.74% | 51,505 | 85.4% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.96% | 227,148 | 76.5% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.20% | 32,963 | 72.3% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.58% | 91,516 | 84.0% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.78% | 86,963 | 80.8% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.43% | 22,800 | 67.4% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.65% | 127,356 | 74.4% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.90% | 112,396 | 80.8% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.37% | 100,539 | 78.9% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.11% | 9,606 | 78.3% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.78% | 112,299 | 81.1% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.12% | 70,524 | 79.3% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.65% | 42,547 | 70.7% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.89% | 27,708 | 79.8% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.59% | 9,126 | 89.1% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.43% | 11,777 | 72.7% |
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.72% | 1,078 | 82.7% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.55% | 275 | 75.2% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.11% | 21,040 | 90.2% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.04% | 1,231 | 91.9% |
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.25% | 5,946 | 73.9% |
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.28% | 1,077 | 84.9% |
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.68% | 5,587 | 83.8% |
[ 23.5% - 24.0% ] 23.90% | 112,750 | 61.7% |
[ 24.0% - 24.5% ] 24.24% | 56,696 | 69.5% |
[ 24.5% - 25.0% ] 24.90% | 9,162 | 88.9% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.59% | 4,407 | 85.5% |
[ 35.5% - 36.0% ] 35.76% | 2,718 | 68.0% |
[ 59.0% - 59.5% ] 59.38% | 32 | 81.2% |