Ecuadorian In Labor Force | Age 25-29
COMPARE
Ecuadorian
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Ecuadorian In Labor Force | Age 25-29
84.4%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 25-29
14.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
205th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ecuadorian In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,761,699 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.212 and weighted average of 84.4%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.18% in labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Ecuadorians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Ecuadorians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 within an area, or if Ecuadorians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Ecuadorians by In Labor Force | Age 25-29
In terms of in labor force | age 25-29, the demographic groups most similar to Ecuadorians are Venezuelan (84.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (84.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Cambodia (84.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Laotian (84.4%, a difference of 0.020%), and Afghan (84.4%, a difference of 0.020%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 25-29 |
| Immigrants from Iraq | 19.0 /100 | #198 | Poor 84.4% |
| Immigrants from Germany | 18.3 /100 | #199 | Poor 84.4% |
| Immigrants from Kazakhstan | 17.5 /100 | #200 | Poor 84.4% |
| Laotians | 16.6 /100 | #201 | Poor 84.4% |
| Afghans | 15.9 /100 | #202 | Poor 84.4% |
| Immigrants from Afghanistan | 15.6 /100 | #203 | Poor 84.4% |
| Venezuelans | 15.1 /100 | #204 | Poor 84.4% |
| Ecuadorians | 14.8 /100 | #205 | Poor 84.4% |
| Immigrants from Cambodia | 14.3 /100 | #206 | Poor 84.4% |
| Immigrants from Armenia | 13.3 /100 | #207 | Poor 84.4% |
| Immigrants from Indonesia | 13.2 /100 | #208 | Poor 84.4% |
| Immigrants from Jordan | 12.8 /100 | #209 | Poor 84.4% |
| Chinese | 12.7 /100 | #210 | Poor 84.3% |
| Immigrants from Venezuela | 12.6 /100 | #211 | Poor 84.3% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 11.7 /100 | #212 | Poor 84.3% |
Ecuadorian In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ecuadorian Data | In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Data |
| Minimum | 0.10% | 68.7% |
| Maximum | 35.8% | 100.0% |
| Range | 35.7% | 31.3% |
| Mean | 10.7% | 85.6% |
| Median | 8.9% | 85.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.5% | 83.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.2% | 87.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.8% | 4.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.0% | 6.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.0% | 6.6% |
Correlation Details
| Ecuadorian Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age 25-29 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.10% | 225,933,652 | 84.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.42% | 35,444,570 | 85.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.74% | 18,232,670 | 84.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.03% | 7,917,521 | 85.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.33% | 4,840,716 | 84.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.64% | 3,859,954 | 83.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.93% | 1,925,093 | 85.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.29% | 10,140,357 | 83.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.49% | 1,887,284 | 83.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.82% | 1,070,403 | 84.2% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.16% | 1,010,085 | 85.5% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.39% | 701,516 | 86.3% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.68% | 274,292 | 85.2% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.04% | 212,133 | 80.4% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.28% | 370,549 | 88.7% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.62% | 297,502 | 78.4% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.94% | 76,272 | 79.9% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.12% | 295,399 | 86.2% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.45% | 98,704 | 81.0% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.79% | 75,504 | 84.6% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.10% | 159,101 | 83.8% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.41% | 105,683 | 85.4% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.71% | 199,062 | 84.6% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.97% | 101,959 | 90.7% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.25% | 222,817 | 79.9% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.52% | 183,356 | 85.8% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.83% | 150,353 | 84.7% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.12% | 107,043 | 89.4% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.53% | 156,526 | 85.0% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.72% | 334,815 | 77.6% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.07% | 31,554 | 84.8% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.34% | 12,343 | 87.6% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.74% | 51,505 | 80.7% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.96% | 227,148 | 84.4% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.20% | 32,963 | 82.3% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.58% | 91,516 | 87.4% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.78% | 86,963 | 90.2% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.65% | 127,356 | 84.1% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.90% | 112,396 | 88.1% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.37% | 100,539 | 85.4% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.11% | 9,461 | 69.7% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.78% | 112,299 | 89.0% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.12% | 70,070 | 85.3% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.65% | 41,907 | 78.7% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.88% | 27,076 | 83.6% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.59% | 9,126 | 86.5% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.45% | 10,396 | 90.7% |
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.72% | 1,078 | 81.3% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.55% | 275 | 100.0% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.11% | 21,040 | 89.3% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.04% | 1,231 | 100.0% |
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.25% | 5,164 | 97.8% |
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.28% | 1,077 | 100.0% |
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.68% | 5,587 | 100.0% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.08% | 1,005 | 97.3% |
[ 23.5% - 24.0% ] 23.90% | 112,750 | 86.8% |
[ 24.0% - 24.5% ] 24.24% | 56,696 | 78.7% |
[ 24.5% - 25.0% ] 24.90% | 9,162 | 68.7% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.59% | 4,407 | 100.0% |
[ 35.5% - 36.0% ] 35.76% | 2,718 | 71.3% |