Ecuadorian In Labor Force | Age 16-19
COMPARE
Ecuadorian
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Ecuadorian In Labor Force | Age 16-19
31.4%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 16-19
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
320th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ecuadorian In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,507,621 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.255 and weighted average of 31.4%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.24% in labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Ecuadorians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Ecuadorians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 within an area, or if Ecuadorians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Ecuadorians by In Labor Force | Age 16-19
In terms of in labor force | age 16-19, the demographic groups most similar to Ecuadorians are Soviet Union (31.4%, a difference of 0.060%), West Indian (31.3%, a difference of 0.23%), Tohono O'odham (31.3%, a difference of 0.35%), Immigrants from Yemen (31.5%, a difference of 0.38%), and Immigrants from Caribbean (31.2%, a difference of 0.48%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 16-19 |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 31.8% |
Cubans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 31.8% |
Immigrants from West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 31.7% |
Filipinos | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 31.7% |
Immigrants from Nicaragua | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 31.6% |
Immigrants from Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 31.5% |
Soviet Union | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 31.4% |
Ecuadorians | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 31.4% |
West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 31.3% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 31.3% |
Immigrants from Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 31.2% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 31.2% |
Immigrants from China | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 31.1% |
Immigrants from Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 31.1% |
Immigrants from Taiwan | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 31.0% |
Ecuadorian In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ecuadorian Data | In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Data |
Minimum | 0.10% | 13.6% |
Maximum | 35.8% | 47.4% |
Range | 35.7% | 33.8% |
Mean | 10.2% | 29.9% |
Median | 8.6% | 30.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.3% | 26.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.1% | 34.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.8% | 7.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.8% | 7.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.8% | 7.4% |
Correlation Details
Ecuadorian Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age 16-19 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.10% | 225,880,382 | 38.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.42% | 35,347,509 | 37.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.74% | 18,204,535 | 33.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.03% | 7,907,216 | 34.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.33% | 4,813,446 | 34.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.64% | 3,855,999 | 32.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.93% | 1,921,477 | 31.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.29% | 10,122,430 | 22.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.49% | 1,885,843 | 31.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.82% | 1,066,963 | 30.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.16% | 1,010,391 | 29.7% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.39% | 697,583 | 28.5% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.68% | 274,292 | 36.1% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.04% | 209,726 | 28.4% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.28% | 365,996 | 33.9% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.62% | 294,645 | 35.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.94% | 72,103 | 32.5% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.12% | 295,399 | 29.9% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.45% | 96,831 | 33.2% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.79% | 74,976 | 17.6% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.10% | 157,454 | 32.3% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.41% | 105,683 | 34.3% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.71% | 199,062 | 33.4% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.97% | 101,959 | 32.2% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.25% | 222,817 | 27.2% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.52% | 183,356 | 26.7% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.83% | 150,353 | 27.6% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.12% | 107,043 | 37.5% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.53% | 155,607 | 26.3% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.72% | 334,815 | 28.0% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.08% | 27,794 | 29.1% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.34% | 12,343 | 41.4% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.74% | 50,351 | 29.7% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.96% | 227,148 | 31.4% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.20% | 32,963 | 33.8% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.58% | 91,516 | 19.6% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.78% | 86,456 | 47.4% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.43% | 21,332 | 30.0% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.65% | 127,356 | 22.0% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.90% | 111,707 | 19.7% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.37% | 100,539 | 25.2% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.11% | 9,461 | 13.6% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.79% | 111,475 | 35.7% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.12% | 70,524 | 19.2% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.65% | 42,547 | 29.8% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.89% | 27,708 | 33.0% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.59% | 9,126 | 37.3% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.43% | 11,777 | 27.2% |
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.72% | 1,078 | 13.6% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.11% | 21,040 | 42.2% |
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.25% | 5,164 | 22.7% |
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.68% | 5,587 | 29.9% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.08% | 1,005 | 34.8% |
[ 23.5% - 24.0% ] 23.90% | 112,750 | 20.8% |
[ 24.0% - 24.5% ] 24.24% | 56,696 | 33.1% |
[ 24.5% - 25.0% ] 24.90% | 9,162 | 46.9% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.59% | 4,407 | 13.6% |
[ 35.5% - 36.0% ] 35.76% | 2,718 | 18.0% |