Ecuadorian In Labor Force | Age 20-24
COMPARE
Ecuadorian
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Ecuadorian In Labor Force | Age 20-24
72.4%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 20-24
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
303rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ecuadorian In Labor Force | Age 20-24 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,809,827 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.238 and weighted average of 72.4%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.22% in labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 24.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Ecuadorians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 24 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Ecuadorians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 24 within an area, or if Ecuadorians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 24 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Ecuadorians by In Labor Force | Age 20-24
In terms of in labor force | age 20-24, the demographic groups most similar to Ecuadorians are Native/Alaskan (72.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from West Indies (72.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Singapore (72.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Jamaica (72.4%, a difference of 0.060%), and Cuban (72.5%, a difference of 0.10%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 20-24 |
Jamaicans | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 72.7% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 72.7% |
Israelis | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 72.6% |
Iranians | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 72.6% |
Armenians | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 72.5% |
Cubans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 72.5% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 72.4% |
Ecuadorians | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 72.4% |
Immigrants from West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 72.4% |
Immigrants from Singapore | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 72.4% |
Immigrants from Jamaica | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 72.4% |
Immigrants from Ecuador | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 72.3% |
Soviet Union | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 72.3% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 72.3% |
Immigrants from Cuba | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 72.0% |
Ecuadorian In Labor Force | Age 20-24 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ecuadorian Data | In Labor Force | Age 20-24 Data |
Minimum | 0.10% | 56.7% |
Maximum | 35.8% | 100.0% |
Range | 35.7% | 43.3% |
Mean | 11.0% | 74.2% |
Median | 8.9% | 73.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.5% | 70.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.2% | 78.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.8% | 8.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.5% | 7.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.4% | 7.7% |
Correlation Details
Ecuadorian Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age 20-24 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.10% | 225,964,969 | 75.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.42% | 35,446,568 | 75.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.74% | 18,238,916 | 74.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.03% | 7,926,412 | 73.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.33% | 4,839,023 | 75.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.64% | 3,862,662 | 71.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.93% | 1,925,950 | 72.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.29% | 10,138,042 | 66.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.49% | 1,889,443 | 71.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.82% | 1,069,066 | 75.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.16% | 1,007,733 | 71.2% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.39% | 701,516 | 72.7% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.68% | 275,994 | 76.1% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.04% | 212,133 | 67.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.28% | 369,136 | 70.4% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.62% | 297,502 | 66.4% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.94% | 76,880 | 75.9% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.12% | 295,399 | 73.6% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.45% | 98,704 | 70.9% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.79% | 75,504 | 78.9% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.10% | 159,101 | 78.2% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.41% | 105,683 | 71.4% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.71% | 199,062 | 73.9% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.97% | 101,959 | 72.7% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.25% | 222,817 | 69.1% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.52% | 183,356 | 74.4% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.83% | 150,353 | 73.3% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.12% | 107,043 | 78.9% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.53% | 155,607 | 70.9% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.72% | 334,815 | 65.1% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.07% | 31,554 | 69.4% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.34% | 12,343 | 97.2% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.74% | 50,351 | 71.8% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.96% | 227,148 | 74.1% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.20% | 32,963 | 80.0% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.58% | 91,516 | 71.8% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.78% | 86,456 | 78.3% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.65% | 127,356 | 70.1% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.90% | 112,396 | 69.3% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.37% | 100,539 | 61.4% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.11% | 9,606 | 73.4% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.78% | 112,299 | 81.6% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.12% | 70,070 | 74.7% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.65% | 42,547 | 72.6% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.89% | 27,708 | 63.8% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.59% | 9,126 | 84.3% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.43% | 11,777 | 63.9% |
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.72% | 1,078 | 56.7% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.11% | 21,040 | 78.9% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.04% | 1,231 | 78.3% |
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.25% | 5,946 | 79.2% |
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.28% | 1,077 | 82.1% |
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.68% | 5,587 | 84.0% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.08% | 1,005 | 95.5% |
[ 23.5% - 24.0% ] 23.90% | 112,750 | 68.4% |
[ 24.0% - 24.5% ] 24.24% | 56,696 | 70.8% |
[ 24.5% - 25.0% ] 24.90% | 9,162 | 69.9% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.59% | 4,407 | 83.1% |
[ 33.0% - 33.5% ] 33.33% | 27 | 100.0% |
[ 35.5% - 36.0% ] 35.76% | 2,718 | 63.6% |