Central American Indian vs Immigrants from China Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 323,193,354 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Central American Indians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.687 and weighted average of 22.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 445,396,670 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.284 and weighted average of 13.4%, a difference of 70.0%.

Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Central American Indian	Immigrants from China
Minimum	6.7%	1.1%
Maximum	100.0%	24.4%
Range	93.3%	23.3%
Mean	40.6%	12.0%
Median	32.4%	11.4%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	22.0%	8.6%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	53.8%	14.0%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	31.8%	5.4%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	25.0%	4.7%
Standard Deviation (Population)	24.8%	4.7%

Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

Demographics Similar to Central American Indians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Central American Indians are Immigrants from Honduras (22.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Congo (22.7%, a difference of 0.27%), Paiute (22.6%, a difference of 0.77%), Cajun (22.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and Yakama (22.6%, a difference of 1.1%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Hondurans	0.0 /100 \| #320	Tragic 22.2%
Colville	0.0 /100 \| #321	Tragic 22.5%
Yakama	0.0 /100 \| #322	Tragic 22.6%
Cajuns	0.0 /100 \| #323	Tragic 22.6%
Paiute	0.0 /100 \| #324	Tragic 22.6%
Immigrants \| Congo	0.0 /100 \| #325	Tragic 22.7%
Immigrants \| Honduras	0.0 /100 \| #326	Tragic 22.8%
Central American Indians	0.0 /100 \| #327	Tragic 22.8%
Dominicans	0.0 /100 \| #328	Tragic 23.7%
Kiowa	0.0 /100 \| #329	Tragic 23.7%
Immigrants \| Dominican Republic	0.0 /100 \| #330	Tragic 23.8%
Apache	0.0 /100 \| #331	Tragic 23.8%
Natives/Alaskans	0.0 /100 \| #332	Tragic 24.0%
Blacks/African Americans	0.0 /100 \| #333	Tragic 24.7%
Menominee	0.0 /100 \| #334	Tragic 25.0%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (13.4%, a difference of 0.46%), Norwegian (13.3%, a difference of 0.55%), Indian (Asian) (13.3%, a difference of 0.72%), Eastern European (13.5%, a difference of 0.78%), and Latvian (13.5%, a difference of 0.81%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Immigrants \| Korea	99.9 /100 \| #18	Exceptional 13.1%
Cypriots	99.9 /100 \| #19	Exceptional 13.2%
Immigrants \| Japan	99.9 /100 \| #20	Exceptional 13.3%
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs	99.9 /100 \| #21	Exceptional 13.3%
Indians (Asian)	99.9 /100 \| #22	Exceptional 13.3%
Norwegians	99.9 /100 \| #23	Exceptional 13.3%
Immigrants \| Eastern Asia	99.9 /100 \| #24	Exceptional 13.4%
Immigrants \| China	99.8 /100 \| #25	Exceptional 13.4%
Eastern Europeans	99.8 /100 \| #26	Exceptional 13.5%
Latvians	99.8 /100 \| #27	Exceptional 13.5%
Tongans	99.8 /100 \| #28	Exceptional 13.6%
Bolivians	99.8 /100 \| #29	Exceptional 13.6%
Asians	99.7 /100 \| #30	Exceptional 13.7%
Turks	99.7 /100 \| #31	Exceptional 13.7%
Danes	99.7 /100 \| #32	Exceptional 13.7%