Pima vs Immigrants Family Households
COMPARE
Pima
Immigrants
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Pima
Immigrants
65.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
64th/ 347
METRIC RANK
66.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
55th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pima vs Immigrants Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,539,566 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Pima and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.198 and weighted average of 65.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 577,097,366 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.425 and weighted average of 66.1%, a difference of 0.32%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Pima | Immigrants |
| Minimum | 40.4% | 42.8% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 59.6% | 57.2% |
| Mean | 69.9% | 68.6% |
| Median | 68.5% | 67.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 63.1% | 64.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 76.5% | 72.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.5% | 8.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.1% | 8.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.9% | 8.5% |
Demographics Similar to Pima and Immigrants by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Costa Rican (65.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Fijian (65.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Filipino (65.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Indonesia (66.0%, a difference of 0.060%), and Japanese (65.9%, a difference of 0.070%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants are Immigrants from Hong Kong (66.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Pennsylvania German (66.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Asia (66.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Korea (66.0%, a difference of 0.15%), and South American (66.0%, a difference of 0.16%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 66.4% |
| Navajo | 100.0 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 66.4% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 100.0 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 66.4% |
| Colombians | 100.0 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 66.3% |
| Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 66.3% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 100.0 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 66.3% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 100.0 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 66.1% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 66.1% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 100.0 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 66.1% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 66.1% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| South Americans | 100.0 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Danes | 100.0 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Central Americans | 100.0 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 100.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Pima | 99.9 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 99.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Fijians | 99.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Japanese | 99.9 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Malaysians | 99.9 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 65.9% |