Czechoslovakian vs Pima Family Households with Children
COMPARE
Czechoslovakian
Pima
Family Households with Children
Family Households with Children Comparison
Czechoslovakians
Pima
27.0%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
6.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
226th/ 347
METRIC RANK
27.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
9.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
223rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czechoslovakian vs Pima Family Households with Children Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 368,397,226 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.225 and weighted average of 27.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,534,200 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Pima and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.243 and weighted average of 27.1%, a difference of 0.20%.
Family Households with Children Correlation Summary
Measurement | Czechoslovakian | Pima |
Minimum | 3.0% | 13.8% |
Maximum | 58.5% | 50.0% |
Range | 55.4% | 36.2% |
Mean | 23.5% | 29.2% |
Median | 24.8% | 27.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 19.0% | 21.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 27.5% | 35.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.5% | 14.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.4% | 9.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.3% | 9.7% |
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians and Pima by Family Households with Children
In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Tsimshian (27.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Scottish (27.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Caribbean (27.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Canadian (27.1%, a difference of 0.080%), and Bulgarian (27.0%, a difference of 0.080%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Paraguayan (27.1%, a difference of 0.010%), New Zealander (27.1%, a difference of 0.030%), German (27.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Austrian (27.1%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from Japan (27.1%, a difference of 0.090%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households with Children |
Africans | 13.0 /100 | #214 | Poor 27.2% |
Northern Europeans | 12.8 /100 | #215 | Poor 27.2% |
Cubans | 12.2 /100 | #216 | Poor 27.1% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 12.1 /100 | #217 | Poor 27.1% |
Greeks | 11.4 /100 | #218 | Poor 27.1% |
Immigrants | Japan | 10.7 /100 | #219 | Poor 27.1% |
Austrians | 9.9 /100 | #220 | Tragic 27.1% |
New Zealanders | 9.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 27.1% |
Paraguayans | 9.4 /100 | #222 | Tragic 27.1% |
Pima | 9.2 /100 | #223 | Tragic 27.1% |
Germans | 8.7 /100 | #224 | Tragic 27.1% |
Canadians | 7.5 /100 | #225 | Tragic 27.1% |
Czechoslovakians | 6.6 /100 | #226 | Tragic 27.0% |
Tsimshian | 6.6 /100 | #227 | Tragic 27.0% |
Scottish | 6.5 /100 | #228 | Tragic 27.0% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 6.3 /100 | #229 | Tragic 27.0% |
Bulgarians | 5.8 /100 | #230 | Tragic 27.0% |
Luxembourgers | 5.5 /100 | #231 | Tragic 27.0% |
Yugoslavians | 5.1 /100 | #232 | Tragic 27.0% |
Immigrants | Italy | 5.0 /100 | #233 | Tragic 27.0% |
Immigrants | Germany | 4.4 /100 | #234 | Tragic 27.0% |