Uruguayan vs Immigrants from Philippines Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,281,356 people shows a strong negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Philippines within Uruguayan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.765. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Uruguayans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.230% in Immigrants from Philippines. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Uruguayans corresponds to a decrease of 229.5 Immigrants from Philippines.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($59,090 compared to $66,161, a difference of 12.0%), median household income ($84,691 compared to $93,899, a difference of 10.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($52,465 compared to $57,930, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($44,318 compared to $44,000, a difference of 0.72%), wage/income gap (25.2% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and median male earnings ($53,680 compared to $55,809, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 16.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (17.0% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 15.9%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (16.4% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.3% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 7.0%), single female poverty (20.2% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 8.8%), and single male poverty (11.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 13.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 12.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.020%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.040%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.87%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 0.72%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.58%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.29%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.36%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 9.7%), births to unmarried women (33.1% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 8.8%), and married-couple households (45.5% compared to 49.3%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.090%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.37, a difference of 4.4%), and currently married (45.6% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 51.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 33.4%), and no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 32.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.8% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.7% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 14.2%), and no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 32.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 18.7%), no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 15.2%), and master's degree (15.3% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (58.8% compared to 58.7%, a difference of 0.17%), ged/equivalency (85.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.28%), and 12th grade, no diploma (90.4% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 11.7%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 8.4%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.21%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.28%), and cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.72%).