Sri Lankan vs Immigrants from Western Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 325,825,811 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Western Africa within Sri Lankan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.251. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Sri Lankans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.020% in Immigrants from Western Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Sri Lankans corresponds to a decrease of 20.5 Immigrants from Western Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Immigrants from Western Africa communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($101,960 compared to $85,676, a difference of 19.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($108,270 compared to $92,384, a difference of 17.2%), and median household income ($93,093 compared to $79,490, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,496 compared to $39,351, a difference of 2.9%), median earnings ($48,040 compared to $44,893, a difference of 7.0%), and per capita income ($44,014 compared to $40,294, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Immigrants from Western Africa communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.6% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 38.2%), child poverty among boys under 16 (14.9% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 29.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.9% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (26.7% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 11.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.4% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 12.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.2% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 13.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Immigrants from Western Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 23.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 22.6%), and male unemployment (5.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.82%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 7.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Immigrants from Western Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.5% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 3.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 0.54%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.040%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Immigrants from Western Africa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 31.4%), births to unmarried women (28.9% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 24.2%), and married-couple households (49.0% compared to 41.4%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.35 compared to 3.29, a difference of 1.9%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 4.1%), and family households with children (29.5% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Immigrants from Western Africa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 97.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 55.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.6% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 39.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.5% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 8.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.0% compared to 49.4%, a difference of 23.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.6% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 39.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Immigrants from Western Africa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 18.3%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 8.3%), and professional degree (4.3% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (89.4% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 0.21%), ged/equivalency (84.0% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and high school diploma (87.0% compared to 87.4%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Immigrants from Western Africa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 18.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 13.7%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.5% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 1.0%), male disability (10.6% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 4.4%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 4.6%).