Navajo vs Immigrants from Philippines Community Comparison

COMPARE

Navajo
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Philippines
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Navajo

Immigrants from Philippines

Poor
Average
1,296
SOCIAL INDEX
10.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
316th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,107
SOCIAL INDEX
58.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
163rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Philippines Integration in Navajo Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 212,692,779 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Philippines within Navajo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.265. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Navajo within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Immigrants from Philippines. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Navajo corresponds to an increase of 4.6 Immigrants from Philippines.
Navajo Integration in Immigrants from Philippines Communities

Navajo vs Immigrants from Philippines Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($59,159 compared to $93,899, a difference of 58.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($69,759 compared to $108,471, a difference of 55.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($66,529 compared to $102,910, a difference of 54.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 10.4%), median female earnings ($33,046 compared to $41,114, a difference of 24.4%), and median earnings ($36,999 compared to $48,266, a difference of 30.4%).
Navajo vs Immigrants from Philippines Income
Income MetricNavajoImmigrants from Philippines
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$29,031
Average
$44,000
Median Family Income
Tragic
$70,989
Exceptional
$108,288
Median Household Income
Tragic
$59,159
Exceptional
$93,899
Median Earnings
Tragic
$36,999
Exceptional
$48,266
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$42,098
Good
$55,809
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,046
Exceptional
$41,114
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$42,380
Exceptional
$57,930
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$66,529
Exceptional
$102,910
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$69,759
Exceptional
$108,471
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$47,722
Exceptional
$66,161
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.4%
Exceptional
24.7%

Navajo vs Immigrants from Philippines Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 147.8%), family poverty (18.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 134.4%), and single male poverty (25.3% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 132.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (40.2% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 51.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 62.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (17.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 67.5%).
Navajo vs Immigrants from Philippines Poverty
Poverty MetricNavajoImmigrants from Philippines
Poverty
Tragic
23.1%
Exceptional
11.0%
Families
Tragic
18.8%
Exceptional
8.0%
Males
Tragic
22.3%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Tragic
23.9%
Exceptional
12.1%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
30.3%
Exceptional
16.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
23.3%
Exceptional
12.0%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
31.6%
Exceptional
14.7%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
30.2%
Exceptional
14.3%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
30.3%
Exceptional
14.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
30.5%
Exceptional
14.4%
Single Males
Tragic
25.3%
Exceptional
10.9%
Single Females
Tragic
31.7%
Exceptional
18.6%
Single Fathers
Tragic
29.2%
Exceptional
14.0%
Single Mothers
Tragic
40.2%
Exceptional
26.5%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
17.5%
Excellent
10.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
19.4%
Good
11.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
21.1%
Exceptional
10.7%

Navajo vs Immigrants from Philippines Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (9.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 94.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (10.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 86.6%), and male unemployment (9.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 80.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 24.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 28.3%).
Navajo vs Immigrants from Philippines Unemployment
Unemployment MetricNavajoImmigrants from Philippines
Unemployment
Tragic
8.4%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Tragic
9.8%
Poor
5.4%
Females
Tragic
7.3%
Tragic
5.5%
Youth < 25
Tragic
18.6%
Tragic
11.9%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
29.0%
Average
17.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
16.1%
Fair
10.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
12.2%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
10.6%
Poor
5.7%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
9.3%
Poor
4.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.7%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
6.7%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.9%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.7%
Poor
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.1%
Poor
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
13.5%
Good
7.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
8.2%
Average
5.4%

Navajo vs Immigrants from Philippines Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (56.6% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 16.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (64.8% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 15.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (69.2% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (32.1% compared to 35.1%, a difference of 9.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (74.6% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 12.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 13.9%).
Navajo vs Immigrants from Philippines Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricNavajoImmigrants from Philippines
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
56.6%
Exceptional
65.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
69.2%
Good
79.8%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
32.1%
Tragic
35.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
64.8%
Average
75.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
74.6%
Tragic
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
73.8%
Fair
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
73.8%
Fair
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
72.8%
Good
82.9%

Navajo vs Immigrants from Philippines Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 69.2%), single mother households (8.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 45.3%), and single father households (3.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 34.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.4% compared to 68.3%, a difference of 3.0%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 6.1%), and family households with children (26.9% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 7.7%).
Navajo vs Immigrants from Philippines Family Structure
Family Structure MetricNavajoImmigrants from Philippines
Family Households
Exceptional
66.4%
Exceptional
68.3%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.9%
Exceptional
29.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
40.1%
Exceptional
49.3%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.65
Exceptional
3.37
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.2%
Fair
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.8%
Good
6.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
39.0%
Exceptional
47.6%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
11.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
51.5%
Excellent
30.4%

Navajo vs Immigrants from Philippines Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 10.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 8.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.8% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 0.79%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 4.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 6.5%).
Navajo vs Immigrants from Philippines Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricNavajoImmigrants from Philippines
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.4%
Exceptional
8.5%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
90.8%
Exceptional
91.5%
2+ Vehicles Available
Average
55.3%
Exceptional
60.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.3%
Exceptional
23.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.2%
Exceptional
8.5%

Navajo vs Immigrants from Philippines Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (23.6% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 54.2%), master's degree (9.4% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 44.3%), and associate's degree (32.6% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 38.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (93.9% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 0.16%), 10th grade (92.3% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.33%), and 6th grade (96.8% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.50%).
Navajo vs Immigrants from Philippines Education Level
Education Level MetricNavajoImmigrants from Philippines
No Schooling Completed
Fair
2.1%
Tragic
2.6%
Nursery School
Average
98.0%
Tragic
97.5%
Kindergarten
Average
98.0%
Tragic
97.4%
1st Grade
Average
97.9%
Tragic
97.4%
2nd Grade
Average
97.9%
Tragic
97.3%
3rd Grade
Average
97.8%
Tragic
97.2%
4th Grade
Fair
97.4%
Tragic
96.8%
5th Grade
Fair
97.2%
Tragic
96.6%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Tragic
96.3%
7th Grade
Poor
95.8%
Tragic
94.9%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Tragic
94.6%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.9%
Tragic
93.7%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.3%
Tragic
92.6%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.0%
Tragic
91.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
87.1%
Tragic
90.2%
High School Diploma
Tragic
85.2%
Tragic
87.8%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.5%
Poor
84.8%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
56.3%
Fair
64.8%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
50.8%
Fair
58.7%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
32.6%
Poor
45.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
23.6%
Poor
36.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.4%
Tragic
13.6%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.9%
Tragic
3.9%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Tragic
1.6%

Navajo vs Immigrants from Philippines Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 54.1%), vision disability (3.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 50.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 49.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 8.6%), self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 11.3%), and cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 12.2%).
Navajo vs Immigrants from Philippines Disability
Disability MetricNavajoImmigrants from Philippines
Disability
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
11.3%
Males
Tragic
14.4%
Excellent
10.9%
Females
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
11.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.6%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.1%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.5%
Exceptional
10.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
33.3%
Good
23.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
58.3%
Tragic
48.8%
Vision
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
4.6%
Average
3.0%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.8%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.5%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Tragic
2.6%