Immigrants from Eritrea vs Immigrants from Italy Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 89,010,141 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Italy within Immigrant from Eritrea communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.282. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Eritrea within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.014% in Immigrants from Italy. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Eritrea corresponds to an increase of 14.2 Immigrants from Italy.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Italy communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (21.4% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 23.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($97,373 compared to $110,434, a difference of 13.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($93,466 compared to $105,201, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,485 compared to $42,446, a difference of 2.3%), householder income under 25 years ($51,574 compared to $54,449, a difference of 5.6%), and median earnings ($47,657 compared to $50,581, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Italy communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 28.4%), child poverty under the age of 16 (18.5% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 27.3%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (18.7% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.74%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 8.0%), and single mother poverty (30.0% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Italy communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 14.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 12.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.84%), female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.94%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.3% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Italy communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 6.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (68.9% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.7% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.31%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.9% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Italy communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 21.6%), single mother households (6.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 16.5%), and married-couple households (42.1% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.8%), family households with children (27.8% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 2.8%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Italy communities in the United States are seen in 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 4.8%), no vehicles in household (10.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 3.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.4% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 0.44%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 2.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Italy communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 36.2%), professional degree (4.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 6.7%), and master's degree (16.4% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (97.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.75%), nursery school (97.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.80%), and kindergarten (97.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Italy communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 11.9%), cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 11.1%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.28%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 2.1%).