Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Latvian Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from South Central Asia
Latvian
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from South Central Asia
Latvians
9.3%
MALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
9th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.6%
MALE POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
20th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Latvian Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 472,354,703 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.620 and weighted average of 9.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,591,162 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.296 and weighted average of 9.6%, a difference of 3.2%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from South Central Asia | Latvian |
| Minimum | 0.33% | 1.5% |
| Maximum | 14.4% | 34.6% |
| Range | 14.0% | 33.2% |
| Mean | 6.6% | 9.2% |
| Median | 6.2% | 8.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.6% | 5.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.4% | 11.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 5.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.0% | 5.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.0% | 5.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Central Asia and Latvians by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Central Asia are Bulgarian (9.3%, a difference of 0.56%), Filipino (9.2%, a difference of 0.79%), Bolivian (9.4%, a difference of 1.2%), Immigrants from Bolivia (9.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and Immigrants from Lithuania (9.4%, a difference of 1.4%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Immigrants from Hong Kong (9.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Scotland (9.6%, a difference of 0.26%), Lithuanian (9.5%, a difference of 0.28%), Norwegian (9.5%, a difference of 0.45%), and Croatian (9.6%, a difference of 0.51%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 8.9% |
| Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Latvians | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Italians | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 9.6% |