Palestinian vs Pima Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Palestinian
Pima
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Palestinians
Pima
15.4%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
91.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
126th/ 347
METRIC RANK
29.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
342nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Palestinian vs Pima Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,667,455 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Palestinians and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.044 and weighted average of 15.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,443,182 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.632 and weighted average of 29.7%, a difference of 93.6%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Palestinian | Pima |
| Minimum | 1.7% | 10.7% |
| Maximum | 43.3% | 100.0% |
| Range | 41.7% | 89.3% |
| Mean | 16.4% | 38.9% |
| Median | 13.7% | 35.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.2% | 22.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.9% | 51.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.7% | 29.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.3% | 23.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.2% | 22.6% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Demographics Similar to Palestinians by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Palestinians are Carpatho Rusyn (15.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Canadian (15.4%, a difference of 0.24%), Czechoslovakian (15.3%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Brazil (15.4%, a difference of 0.35%), and Mongolian (15.4%, a difference of 0.38%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
| Belgians | 93.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 15.2% |
| South Africans | 93.0 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 15.2% |
| Scottish | 93.0 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 15.2% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 92.8 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 92.3 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Czechoslovakians | 92.1 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Palestinians | 91.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 91.1 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Canadians | 90.6 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 90.3 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Mongolians | 90.2 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 90.0 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 88.7 /100 | #132 | Excellent 15.5% |
| Welsh | 88.3 /100 | #133 | Excellent 15.5% |
Demographics Similar to Pima by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Navajo (30.3%, a difference of 1.8%), Yuman (30.6%, a difference of 3.0%), Immigrants from Yemen (28.9%, a difference of 3.1%), Tohono O'odham (31.6%, a difference of 6.1%), and Lumbee (31.9%, a difference of 7.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.5% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 24.5% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 24.7% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 25.3% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 25.9% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 26.2% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 28.9% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 29.7% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 30.3% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 30.6% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 31.6% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 31.9% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 32.8% |