Immigrants from Italy vs Immigrants from Sri Lanka Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 130,240,252 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sri Lanka within Immigrant from Italy communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.474. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Italy within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.064% in Immigrants from Sri Lanka. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Italy corresponds to an increase of 64.3 Immigrants from Sri Lanka.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Italy and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($64,065 compared to $69,426, a difference of 8.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($110,434 compared to $119,094, a difference of 7.8%), and median household income ($93,465 compared to $99,943, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,449 compared to $54,512, a difference of 0.12%), wage/income gap (26.5% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and per capita income ($48,654 compared to $50,555, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Italy and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.4% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 9.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.6% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 7.7%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.9% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.060%), male poverty (10.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.58%), and female poverty (12.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Italy and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 7.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 7.1%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.10%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.40%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Italy and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.4% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 4.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.84%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.7% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.040%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Italy and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.9% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 10.0%), divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 6.5%), and family households with children (27.0% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.8% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.56%), currently married (47.7% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 0.78%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.22, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Italy and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in 3 or more vehicles in household (18.7% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 2.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 0.14%), no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Italy and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 34.9%), professional degree (5.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 19.6%), and master's degree (17.2% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.8% compared to 95.8%, a difference of 0.0%), 6th grade (97.1% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.010%), and 7th grade (96.1% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.010%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Italy and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 13.1%), ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 11.6%), and hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.8% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 0.57%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 2.1%).